Their sentences are quotes from their site
We write what a product publishes about itself and give the date we read it. Their page changes without our involvement, so a claim without a date goes stale quietly.
Comparisons
What actually differs, and how to check it
Side-by-side notes on the tools prospects ask about most. About someone else's product we write only what they publish themselves, with the date we read it. We do not argue with their marketing claims: the comparison covers features you can verify on both sides.
Their pages read on 9 September 2026 · our claims name the mechanism behind them · no tick-and-cross tables
How to read these pages
A comparison is only useful if you can check it. So we keep four rules, including where they make us look worse.
No mention is not the same as no feature
We will not write that they lack something unless their page says so. We do not know what sits in a product nobody wrote about.
We do not argue with their advertising
Numbers in someone else's headline are their promise and their evidence. We compare features verifiable on both sides, not effectiveness.
Our side needs backing too
Every sentence about us points at the mechanism behind it. Where there is no mechanism, there is no sentence.
Rather see it than read it?
We will run the agent on your own content and your own case, with nothing to install.